The simplest experiment to see that Electron doesn't exist

Here is Ken Wheeler's quote for Steinmezts:

“Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the ‘electron’, on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated” - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)

     The idea of electricity as a flow of ‘electrons’ in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as “a psychosis”. This encouraged Heaviside to begin a series of writings

    Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.

Quote for Steinmezts by Vilo Shmillo:

It is not there. It makes you think why someone who is trying to prove their point with quotation of someone well regarded would  alter it and therefor falsify it.

He is misquoting Steinmetz. Read the original book. Page 13.

Ken Wheeler's video about Electrontron does not exist:

Easy Power Plan:

There are two possibilities:

1. Ken Wheeler added the ‘electron’
2. Steinmezts text was revised

However, both cases indicate: electro-static charge
But, what about the ‘electron’ = "electro-static charge"?

So I came up with my own "counterproductive" experiment, based on what science claims. Since then contradictions. This is a counterproductive proof in mathematics.

Experiments and arguments to see that Electron does not exist:

Pictures for experiments:

(Click on the image to see large image)

Suppose I have:

• Metal A, Metal B
• Number of Mole A = Number of Mole B = M
• The free electronic number of metal A is 2, and the free electronic number of metal B is 1
• Electron's charge is −1.602176634×10⁻¹⁹ C
• Voltage generator - The machine makes the metal positively contaminated
• X is the light bulb

Then:

• The voltage of A is Va, of B is Vb
• Va - Vb> 0
• [2 (+ e) - 1 (+ e)]. M = + e.M
• Machines for Metals A and B are free of free electrons and have corresponding voltage values ​​of Va and Vb.

The X light stays on when there are no electrons going through the filament.

Conclude:

If we think the Electron exists to define the current, then this phenomenon indicates that the definition is incomplete, or the Electron does not exist.

In the case of the experiment: The current is not a directional displacement of charged particles. Electron does not exist.

What if the Electron detector still sees the Electrons (as per the identification of the detector) on the blue wire above?
This can be inferred:

Electrons are born out of nothingness. This is contrary to the law of thermodynamics. The fall of many theories entailed.

There is no positive or negative charge (of its nature). Because Electron was born from that nature.

The electron doesn't exist, it's just an expression of something we don't know. Because if it exists, it cannot be born from nothing.

Maybe you like:

• MAGNETISM'S Secrets of POLARITY 🔷 Nature's Polarity
• Tesla: logic and intelligence about light 

✰* Revealed At Last: Ancient Invention Generates Energy-On-Demand

✔ Nikola Tesla’s method of magnifying electric power by neutralizing the magnetic counter-forces in an electric generator

Generates Energy-On-Demand: Easy Power Plan Will Change Our World Forever

✔ Currents are 180 out of phase with each other, Lenz's law naturally is broken
✔ Principle of Resonance to achieve Overunity
✔ Generate generators without rotating motion, but based on the principle of rotating magnets. Because magnetism varies based on electronic circuit design: coils, capacitors, Negative resistance, etc.The change of magnetism does not require the rotation of the magnet.